Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Prediction of Cell-Penetrating Potential of Modified Peptides Containing Natural and Chemically Modified Residues.

Vinod Kumar, Piyush Agrawal, Rajesh Kumar, Sherry Bhalla, Salman Sadullah Usmani, Grish C Varshney, Gajendra P S Raghava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Interpretable molecular encodings and representations for machine learning tasks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Short Fragmented Peptides fromCurrent drug discovery technologies · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In Silico Design of Chemically Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vinod KumarCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.
Piyush AgrawalCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.
Rajesh KumarCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.
Sherry BhallaCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.
Salman Sadullah UsmaniCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.
Grish C VarshneyCell Biology and Immunology, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector-39A, Chandigarh, India.
Gajendra P S RaghavaCenter for Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing drug delivery vehicles using cell-penetrating peptides is a hot area of research in the field of medicine. In the past, number of

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidechemical descriptorsin silico methodmachine learningmodified cell-penetrating peptidesRandom ForestSVM

Identifiers

PMID29706944
PMCPMC5906597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.