Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706876›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Changing Brain Networks Through Non-invasive Neuromodulation.

Wing Ting To, Dirk De Ridder, John Hart, Sven Vanneste

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04864080 (Transdiagnostic Cognitive Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04864080 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Biomarkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsPain, DepressionArmsComputer game/task, Health surveys online
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Invasive and Non-invasive Neurostimulation for OCD.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Safety and Efficacy of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wing Ting ToSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Dirk De RidderDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
John HartSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Sven VannesteSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

brain hubsbrain networksstimulation targettranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29706876
PMCPMC5908883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.