Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2018

Plasticity in One Hemisphere, Control From Two: Adaptation in Descending Motor Pathways After Unilateral Corticospinal Injury in Neonatal Rats.

Tong-Chun Wen, Sophia Lall, Corey Pagnotta, James Markward, Disha Gupta, Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Jacqueline Bucci, Lucy Greenwald, Madelyn Klugman, N Jeremy Hill and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tong-Chun WenMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Sophia LallMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Corey PagnottaMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
James MarkwardMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Disha GuptaMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-GiridharanMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Jacqueline BucciMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Lucy GreenwaldMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Madelyn KlugmanMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
N Jeremy HillMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.
Jason B CarmelMotor Recovery Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.

Funding

Injury and adaptation in the developing rat corticospinal and rubrospinal tractsK08NS073796 · NINDS · WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE MED RES INST · PI CARMEL, JASON BRANT · 2011 to 2015
$910k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS073796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After injury to the corticospinal tract (CST) in early development there is large-scale adaptation of descending motor pathways. Some studies suggest the uninjured hemisphere controls the impaired forelimb, while others suggest that the injured hemisphere does; these pathways have never been compared directly. We tested the contribution of each motor cortex to the recovery forelimb function after neonatal injury of the CST. We cut the left pyramid (pyramidotomy) of postnatal day 7 rats, which caused a measurable impairment of the right forelimb. We used pharmacological inactivation of each motor cortex to test its contribution to a skilled reach and supination task. Rats with neonatal pyramidotomy were further impaired by inactivation of motor cortex in both the injured and the uninjured hemispheres, while the forelimb of uninjured rats was impaired only from the contralateral motor cortex. Thus, inactivation demonstrated motor control from each motor cortex. In contrast, physiological and anatomical interrogation of these pathways support adaptations only in the uninjured hemisphere. Intracortical microstimulation of motor cortex in the uninjured hemisphere of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy produced responses from both forelimbs, while stimulation of the injured hemisphere did not elicit responses from either forelimb. Both anterograde and retrograde tracers were used to label corticofugal pathways. There was no increased plasticity from the injured hemisphere, either from cortex to the red nucleus or the red nucleus to the spinal cord. In contrast, there were very strong CST connections to both halves of the spinal cord from the uninjured motor cortex. Retrograde tracing produced maps of each forelimb within the uninjured hemisphere, and these were partly segregated. This suggests that the uninjured hemisphere may encode separate control of the unimpaired and the impaired forelimbs of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAxonsForelimbFunctional LateralityMotor ActivityMotor CortexMovement DisordersNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of Functioncorticospinal tractdeficitsneonatal pyramidotomyplasticityratsrubrospinal tract

Identifiers

PMID29706871
PMCPMC5906589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.