Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706752›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2018

Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods.

Min Lu, Saad Sadiq, Daniel J Feaster, Hemant Ishwaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Precision ecology for targeted conservation action.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  10. Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning and personalized nutrition: a promising liaison?European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min LuDivision of Biostatistics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Saad SadiqDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Daniel J FeasterDivision of Biostatistics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Hemant IshwaranDivision of Biostatistics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

Funding

The Florida Node Alliance of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA013720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel J Feaster, Viviana Elizabeth Horigian · 2015 to 2026
$50.6M
Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000460 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SACCO, RALPH L. · 2012 to 2016
$16.9M
NextGen Random ForestsR01GM125072 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ISHWARAN, HEMANT · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Identifying Subgroups with Different Responses to HIV Risk Reduction CounselingR21DA038641 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FEASTER, DANIEL J · 2014 to 2015
$419k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000460NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038641NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimation of individual treatment effect in observational data is complicated due to the challenges of confounding and selection bias. A useful inferential framework to address this is the counterfactual (potential outcomes) model, which takes the hypothetical stance of asking what if an individual had received

Indexed as

Counterfactual modelIndividual treatment effect (ITE)Propensity scoreSynthetic forestsTreatment heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID29706752
PMCPMC5920646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.