Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706674›Full record

ArticleSoil biology & biochemistry2017

Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N

Yinghong Yuan, Huaihai Chen, Wenqiao Yuan, David Williams, John T Walker, Wei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soil biology & biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Biochar and Manure Co-Application on Aggregate Stability and Pore Size Distribution of Vertisols.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The mechanisms of biochar interactions with microorganisms in soil.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Biochar suppresses NEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CHFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinghong YuanInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China.
Huaihai ChenDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Wenqiao YuanDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
David WilliamsEnvironmental Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC, USA.
John T WalkerAir Pollution Prevention and Control Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC, USA.
Wei ShiDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USNorth Carolina State University · USNanchang Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land application of compost has been a promising remediation strategy for soil health and environmental quality, but substantial emissions of greenhouse gases, especially N

Identifiers

PMID29706674
PMCPMC5920545
OpenAlexW2621235935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.