Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706521›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Chromosome Segregation Is Biased by Kinetochore Size.

Danica Drpic, Ana C Almeida, Paulo Aguiar, Fioranna Renda, Joana Damas, Harris A Lewin, Denis M Larkin, Alexey Khodjakov, Helder Maiato

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Primary cell cultures from the single-chromosome ant Myrmecia croslandi.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Measuring and modeling the dynamics of mitotic error correction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Spindle architecture constrains karyotype in budding yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Remarkable chromosomes and karyotypes: A top 10 list.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024
    Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Danica DrpicChromosome Instability & Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Graduate Program in Areas of Basic and Applied Biology (GABBA), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Ana C AlmeidaChromosome Instability & Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Paulo AguiarInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Engenharia Biomédica (INEB), Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Fioranna RendaWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201, USA.
Joana DamasDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Denis M LarkinDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Alexey KhodjakovWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201, USA; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
Helder MaiatoChromosome Instability & Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Cell Division Group, Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: maiato@i3s.up.pt.
Universidade do Porto · PTRoyal Veterinary College · GBi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTNew York State Department of Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF CENTROSOMES IN SOMATIC CELLSR01GM059363 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KHODJAKOV, ALEXEY L · 1999 to 2017
$6.3M
Efficiency and fidelity in mitotic spindle assemblyR35GM130298 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KHODJAKOV, ALEXEY L · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
European Research Council 681443NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059363NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome missegregation during mitosis or meiosis is a hallmark of cancer and the main cause of prenatal death in humans. The gain or loss of specific chromosomes is thought to be random, with cell viability being essentially determined by selection. Several established pathways including centrosome amplification, sister-chromatid cohesion defects, or a compromised spindle assembly checkpoint can lead to chromosome missegregation. However, how specific intrinsic features of the kinetochore-the critical chromosomal interface with spindle microtubules-impact chromosome segregation remains poorly understood. Here we used the unique cytological attributes of female Indian muntjac, the mammal with the lowest known chromosome number (2n = 6), to characterize and track individual chromosomes with distinct kinetochore size throughout mitosis. We show that centromere and kinetochore functional layers scale proportionally with centromere size. Measurement of intra-kinetochore distances, serial-section electron microscopy, and RNAi against key kinetochore proteins confirmed a standard structural and functional organization of the Indian muntjac kinetochores and revealed that microtubule binding capacity scales with kinetochore size. Surprisingly, we found that chromosome segregation in this species is not random. Chromosomes with larger kinetochores bi-oriented more efficiently and showed a 2-fold bias to congress to the equator in a motor-independent manner. Despite robust correction mechanisms during unperturbed mitosis, chromosomes with larger kinetochores were also strongly biased to establish erroneous merotelic attachments and missegregate during anaphase. This bias was impervious to the experimental attenuation of polar ejection forces on chromosome arms by RNAi against the chromokinesin Kif4a. Thus, kinetochore size is an important determinant of chromosome segregation fidelity.

Indexed as

CentromereChromosome SegregationChromosomes, MammalianKinetochoresMitosisAnimalsCells, CulturedFibroblastsMicrotubulesMuntjacsSpindle Apparatusaneuploidycentromerechromosome congressionchromosome segregationIndian muntjackinetochoremerotelic attachmentsmitosis

Identifiers

PMID29706521
PMCPMC5954971
OpenAlexW2792238040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.