Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706188›Full record

ArticleOral oncology2018

Patients with integrated HPV16 in head and neck cancer show poor survival.

Tara J Nulton, Nak-Kyeong Kim, Laurence J DiNardo, Iain M Morgan, Brad Windle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. HPV Integration in Head and Neck Cancer: Downstream Splicing Events and Expression Ratios Linked with Poor Outcomes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tara J NultonPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980566, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. Electronic address: nultontj@vcu.edu.
Nak-Kyeong KimVCU Massey Cancer Center, Box 980037, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980032, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: kyeong.kim@vcuhealth.org.
Laurence J DiNardoVCU Massey Cancer Center, Box 980037, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980146, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. Electronic address: laurence.dinardo@vcuhealth.org.
Iain M MorganPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980566, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; VCU Massey Cancer Center, Box 980037, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. Electronic address: immorgan@vcu.edu.
Brad WindlePhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980566, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; VCU Massey Cancer Center, Box 980037, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. Electronic address: bwindle@vcu.edu.

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000058 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2015
$12.5M
Novel Structures of the Human Papilloma Virus Genome in HNSCCR03DE026230 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WINDLE, BRAD E. · 2016 to 2017
$458k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE026230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe previously reported identifying three categories of HPV16-positive head and neck tumors based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA and DNA sequence data. Category 1 had truly integrated HPV16 genomes, category 2 had simple episomal genomes, and category 3 had novel episomes that were a hybrid between viral and human DNA. Using our categorization, we investigated in this study survival of patients with integrated HPV16 tumors versus patients with episomal HPV16 tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe TCGA RNA-Seq sequence reads were used to quantify HPV E2 and E7 gene expression, which was used as a marker for HPV integration.

resultsThe results demonstrate that integration is associated with poor survival; those patients with integrated HPV tumors fared no better than non-HPV tumors in their five-year survival. Integrated HPV in tumors was found strikingly to be prevalent in patients born earlier while episomal HPV was prevalent in patients born later. We also observed a fairly constant incidence of all HPV forms among head and neck cancer patients over the last eight years of this study (2006-2013).

conclusionWe propose our characterization of HPV integrated and episomal state is more accurate than previous studies that may have mischaracterized the hybrid HPV-human DNA episomes as integrated. The state of integrated HPV is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Results suggest that the incidence of integrated HPV among all HPV forms peaked and is decreasing. We discuss the importance of our findings for the management of HPV positive head and neck cancer.

Indexed as

Survival AnalysisFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHuman papillomavirus 16HumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPlasmidsAgeHead and neck cancerHuman papillomavirusIncidenceSurvivalYear of birth

Identifiers

PMID29706188
PMCPMC5930384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.