Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705968›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018

Performance validation of an amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay and mutation profiling of 648 Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Yajian Wang, Haijing Liu, Yingyong Hou, Xiaoyan Zhou, Li Liang, Zhihong Zhang, Huaiyin Shi, Sanpeng Xu, Peizhen Hu, Zuyu Zheng and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct Driver Pathway Enrichments and a High Prevalence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Relationship between mismatch repair protein,World journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Yajian WangDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Haijing LiuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Yingyong HouDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoyan ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Li LiangHuayin Laboratory, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Zhihong ZhangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Huaiyin ShiDepartment of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital and Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100000, China.
Sanpeng XuInstitute of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Peizhen HuDepartment of Pathology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Zuyu ZhengSinglera Genomics Inc., Shanghai, 201318, China.
Rui LiuSinglera Genomics Inc., Shanghai, 201318, China.
Tingdong TangSinglera Genomics Inc., Shanghai, 201318, China.
Feng YeLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. fengye@scu.edu.cn.
Zhiyong LiangDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Hong BuDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sinotech Genomics (China) · CNSichuan University · CNAir Force Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNNanjing Medical University · CNPeking University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNTongji Hospital · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province 2017SZ0005Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (CN) 2016YFC0906000National Natural Science Foundation of China 81401990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a promising approach for tumor somatic mutation detection. However, stringent validation is required for its application on clinical specimens, especially for low-quality formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, we validated the performance of an amplicon-based targeted NGS assay, OncoAim™ DNA panel, on both commercial reference FFPE samples and clinical FFPE samples of Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Then we profiled the mutation spectrum of 648 Chinese CRC patients in a multicenter study to explore its clinical utility. This NGS assay achieved 100% test specificity and 95-100% test sensitivity for variants with mutant allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% when median read depth ≥ 500×. The orthogonal methods including amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR and Sanger sequencing validated that NGS generated three false negatives (FNs) but no false positives (FPs) among 516 clinical samples for KRAS aberration detection. Genomic profiling of Chinese CRC patients with this assay revealed that 63.3% of the tumors harbored clinically actionable alterations. Besides the commonly mutated genes including TP53 (52.82%), KRAS (46.68%), APC (24.09%), PIK3CA (18.94%), SMAD4 (9.47%), BRAF (6.15%), FBXW7 (5.32%), and NRAS (4.15%), other less frequently mutated genes were also identified. Statistically significant association of specific mutated genes with certain clinicopathological features was detected, e.g., both BRAF and PIK3CA were more prevalent in right-side CRC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). We concluded this targeted NGS assay is qualified for clinical practice, and our findings could help the diagnosis and prognosis of Chinese CRC patients.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdultAgedColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationYoung AdultErbB ReceptorsActionable variantsColorectal cancer (CRC)Molecular test validationNext-generation sequencing (NGS)

Identifiers

PMID29705968
OpenAlexW2801169819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.