Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705884›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2018

Building predictive in vitro pulmonary toxicity assays using high-throughput imaging and artificial intelligence.

Jia-Ying Joey Lee, James Alastair Miller, Sreetama Basu, Ting-Zhen Vanessa Kee, Lit-Hsin Loo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia-Ying Joey LeeBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
James Alastair MillerBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
Sreetama BasuBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
Ting-Zhen Vanessa KeeBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
Lit-Hsin LooBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore. loolh@bii.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-9840
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human lungs are susceptible to the toxicity induced by soluble xenobiotics. However, the direct cellular effects of many pulmonotoxic chemicals are not always clear, and thus, a general in vitro assay for testing pulmonotoxicity applicable to a wide variety of chemicals is not currently available. Here, we report a study that uses high-throughput imaging and artificial intelligence to build an in vitro pulmonotoxicity assay by automatically comparing and selecting human lung-cell lines and their associated quantitative phenotypic features most predictive of in vivo pulmonotoxicity. This approach is called "High-throughput In vitro Phenotypic Profiling for Toxicity Prediction" (HIPPTox). We found that the resulting assay based on two phenotypic features of a human bronchial epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B, can accurately classify 33 reference chemicals with human pulmonotoxicity information (88.8% balance accuracy, 84.6% sensitivity, and 93.0% specificity). In comparison, the predictivity of a standard cell-viability assay on the same set of chemicals is much lower (77.1% balanced accuracy, 84.6% sensitivity, and 69.5% specificity). We also used the assay to evaluate 17 additional test chemicals with unknown/unclear human pulmonotoxicity, and experimentally confirmed that many of the pulmonotoxic reference and predicted-positive test chemicals induce DNA strand breaks and/or activation of the DNA-damage response (DDR) pathway. Therefore, HIPPTox helps us to uncover these common modes-of-action of pulmonotoxic chemicals. HIPPTox may also be applied to other cell types or models, and accelerate the development of predictive in vitro assays for other cell-type- or organ-specific toxicities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceA549 CellsBronchiCell LineCell SurvivalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLungPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityToxicity TestsXenobioticsXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID29705884
PMCPMC6002469
OpenAlexW2799347292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.