Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705769›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Ongoing training of community health workers in low-income andmiddle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature.

James O'Donovan, Charles O'Donovan, Isla Kuhn, Sonia Ehrlich Sachs, Niall Winters

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Community health worker and family support for addiction treatment services.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James O'DonovanDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-5436
Charles O'DonovanFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Isla KuhnMedical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sonia Ehrlich SachsEarth Institute, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
Niall WintersDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8597-2914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUnderstanding the current landscape of ongoing training for community health workers (CHWs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is important both for organisations responsible for their training, as well as researchers and policy makers. This scoping review explores this under-researched area by mapping the current delivery implementation and evaluation of ongoing training provision for CHWs in LMICs.

designSystematic scoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, Global Health, Web of Science, Scopus, ASSIA, LILACS, BEI and ERIC. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies focusing on the provision of ongoing training for CHWs working in a country defined as low income and middle income according to World Bank Group 2012 classification of economies.

resultsThe scoping review found 35 original studies that met the inclusion criteria. Ongoing training activities for CHWs were described as supervision (n=19), inservice or refresher training (n=13) or a mixture of both (n=3). Although the majority of studies emphasised the importance of providing ongoing training, several studies reported no impact of ongoing training on performance indicators. The majority of ongoing training was delivered inperson; however, four studies reported the use of mobile technologies to support training delivery. The outcomes from ongoing training activities were measured and reported in different ways, including changes in behaviour, attitudes and practice measured in a quantitative manner (n=16), knowledge and skills (n=6), qualitative assessments (n=5) or a mixed methods approach combining one of the aforementioned modalities (n=8).

conclusionsThis scoping review highlights the diverse range of ongoing training for CHWs in LMICs. Given the expansion of CHW programmes globally, more attention should be given to the design, delivery, monitoring and sustainability of ongoing training from a health systems strengthening perspective.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDeveloping CountriesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMidwiferyPovertyPregnancyCommunity Health Worker (CHW)educationglobal healthin-service traininglay health workerlow- and middle-income country (LMIC)on-going trainingrefresher trainingsupportive supervision

Identifiers

PMID29705769
PMCPMC5931295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.