ArticleBMJ open2018
Shared research priorities for pessary use in women with prolapse: results from a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05458375 (Vaginal Estradiol Use in Pessary Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vaginal Estradiol Use in Pessary Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- What are the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women? A systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Do vaginal pessaries used to treat pelvic organ prolapse impact on sexual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- UK Clinical Guideline for Best Practice in the Use of Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Article
- Article
- Pessary management practices for pelvic organ prolapse among Australian health care practitioners: a cross-sectional study.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Development of a multinational, multidisciplinary competency framework for physiotherapy training in pessary management: an E-Delphi study.International urogynecology journal · 2022Review
- What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- A service evaluation to determine where and who delivers pessary care in the UK.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Current trends in pessary management of vaginal prolapse: a multidisciplinary survey of UK practice.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- A patient-clinician James Lind Alliance partnership to identify research priorities for hyperemesis gravidarum.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.BMJ open · 2020Article
- The James Lind Alliance process approach: scoping review.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the shared priorities for future research of women affected by and clinicians involved with pessary use for the management of prolapse.
designA priority setting project using a consensus method.
settingA James Lind Alliance Pessary use for prolapse Priority Setting Partnership (JLA Pessary PSP) conducted from May 2016 to September 2017 in the UK.
participantsThe PSP was run by a Steering Group of three women with experience of pessary use, three experienced clinicians involved with management of prolapse, two researchers with relevant experience, a JLA adviser and a PSP leader. Two surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2017. The first gathered questions about pessaries, and the second asked respondents to prioritise a list of questions. A final workshop was held on 8 September 2017 involving 10 women and 13 clinician representatives with prolapse and pessary experience.
resultsA top 10 list of priorities for future research in pessary use for prolapse was agreed by consensus.
conclusionsWomen with experience of pessary use and clinicians involved with prolapse management have worked together to determine shared priorities for future research. Aligning the top 10 results with existing research findings will highlight the gaps in current evidence and signpost future research to areas of priority. Effective dissemination of the results will enable research funding bodies to focus on gathering the evidence to answer the questions that matter most to those who will be affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.