Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705761›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre.

Barry Mullins, Harold Akehurst, David Slattery, Tim Chesser

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of direct oral anticoagulants on hip fracture care in Australia and New Zealand: a prospective patient sprint audit.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The management of anticoagulated fragility femoral fracture patients.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of DOAC plasma concentration on perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients with hip fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Barry MullinsTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Harold AkehurstTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
David SlatteryTrauma and Orthopaedics, Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Windsor, Victoria, Australia.
Tim ChesserTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Orthopaedic Trauma Association · USSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether not waiting for the elimination of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has an effect on the amount of perioperative bleeding in patients who undergo operative treatment of a hip fracture.

designObservation, retrospective case-control study.

settingA single UK major trauma centre.

participantsPatients who sustained a hip fracture were identified using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). All those found to be taking a DOAC at the time of fracture were identified (n=63). A matched group not taking a DOAC was also identified from the NHFD (n=62). MAIN OUTCOME: Perioperative drop in haemoglobin concentration.

resultsThere was no relationship between admission to operation interval and perioperative change in haemoglobin concentration in patients taking DOACs (regression coefficient=-0.06 g/L/hour; 95% CI -0.32-0.20; p=0.64). No relationship was found between the time from admission to operation interval and the probability of transfusion (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.90; p=0.16) or reoperation (OR=1.04; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.16; p=0.49). One mortality was recorded in the DOAC group within 30 days of admission, and this compared with five in the matched group of patients (p=0.2).

conclusionsDelaying surgery in patients who sustain a hip fracture who are taking a DOAC drug has not been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding or affect their mortality in this study.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHip FracturesTime-to-TreatmentAdministration, OralCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersAnticoagulantsanticoagulantsblood transfusionhip fracturesperioperative carepostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID29705761
PMCPMC5931299
OpenAlexW2802235434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.