Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705745›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2019

Availability, price and promotions for cigarettes and non-cigarette tobacco products: an observational comparison of US Air Force bases with nearby tobacco retailers, 2016.

Amanda Y Kong, Shelley D Golden, Allison E Myers, Melissa A Little, Robert Klesges, Wayne Talcott, Sara M Vandegrift, Daniel G Cassidy, Kurt M Ribisl

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of Tobacco Product Prices at Fort Liberty Army Installation and Surrounding Community Areas, 2021.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda Y KongDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA.
Shelley D GoldenDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA.
Allison E MyersDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA.
Melissa A LittleCenter for Addiction and Prevention Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Robert KlesgesCenter for Addiction and Prevention Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Wayne TalcottCenter for Addiction and Prevention Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Sara M VandegriftDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA.
Daniel G CassidyWilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Maximizing state & local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of saleU01CA154281 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE, LUKE, DOUGLAS A · 2011 to 2015
$6.3M
New, Emerging, and Traditional Tobacco Use in the MilitaryR01DA037273 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154281NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionActive duty military personnel have higher cigarette and smokeless tobacco use rates than civilian populations. Although US Airmen (called Airmen regardless of gender or rank) are required to be tobacco-free during initial training, many resume use once this period ends, perhaps as a result of easy access to cheap tobacco products.

methodsBetween July and September 2016, we collected tobacco product, price and promotion information by visiting on-base (n=28) and off-base (n=80) tobacco retailers near the eight technical training bases where approximately 99% of Airmen attend training. We conducted mixed linear effects models to examine on-base versus off-base differences.

resultsCigarette packs were 11%-12% cheaper at on-base retailers compared with off-base retailers. Newport Menthol and Marlboro Red cigarette packs were $0.87 and $0.80 lower on-base (p<0.001) while the cheapest pack available was $0.54 lower on-base (p<0.01). Copenhagen smokeless tobacco was also significantly cheaper on-base (B=-0.65, p<0.01). Interior price promotions were more common on-base.

conclusionsRetail stores located on Air Force bases sell cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products at prices well below those in nearby off-base retailers: the vast majority of these retailers feature interior price promotions for these products. Federal policies regulating prices of on-base tobacco sales, if implemented more effectively, have the potential to protect the health of Airmen by helping them remain tobacco-free after technical training.

Indexed as

CommerceHumansMarketingMilitary FacilitiesResidence CharacteristicsTobacco Productsadvertising and promotionnon-cigarette tobacco productspricepriority/special populationspublic policy

Identifiers

PMID29705745
PMCPMC6204316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.