Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705062›Full record

ArticleTheoretical population biology2018

Ecological change points: The strength of density dependence and the loss of history.

José M Ponciano, Mark L Taper, Brian Dennis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical population biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José M PoncianoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. Electronic address: josemi@ufl.edu.
Mark L TaperDepartment of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.
Brian DennisDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences and Department of Statistical Science, University of Idaho, Moscow ID 83844-1136, USA.

Funding

Genetic regulationR01GM103604 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PONCIANO, JOSE MIGUEL · 2013 to 2016
$947k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Change points in the dynamics of animal abundances have extensively been recorded in historical time series records. Little attention has been paid to the theoretical dynamic consequences of such change-points. Here we propose a change-point model of stochastic population dynamics. This investigation embodies a shift of attention from the problem of detecting when a change will occur, to another non-trivial puzzle: using ecological theory to understand and predict the post-breakpoint behavior of the population dynamics. The proposed model and the explicit expressions derived here predict and quantify how density dependence modulates the influence of the pre-breakpoint parameters into the post-breakpoint dynamics. Time series transitioning from one stationary distribution to another contain information about where the process was before the change-point, where is it heading and how long it will take to transition, and here this information is explicitly stated. Importantly, our results provide a direct connection of the strength of density dependence with theoretical properties of dynamic systems, such as the concept of resilience. Finally, we illustrate how to harness such information through maximum likelihood estimation for state-space models, and test the model robustness to widely different forms of compensatory dynamics. The model can be used to estimate important quantities in the theory and practice of population recovery.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmentModels, BiologicalAnimalsEcologyLikelihood FunctionsPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsStochastic ProcessesTime FactorsBreakpointChange-point stochastic processesGompertz modelState–space modelsStrength of density dependence

Identifiers

PMID29705062
PMCPMC5960640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.