Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29705042›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2018

Pre-clinical MR elastography: Principles, techniques, and applications.

P V Bayly, J R Garbow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physics in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P V BaylyMechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in Saint Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: pvb@wustl.edu.
J R GarbowRadiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

IN VIVO MEASUREMENT OF BRAIN BIOMECHANICSR01NS055951 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
In Vivo Measurement of Brain BiomechanicsR56NS055951 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2018 to 2018
$563k
MECHANICAL CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPING BRAINR21EB005834 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2009 to 2010
$410k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB005834NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055951NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS055951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a method for measuring the mechanical properties of soft tissue in vivo, non-invasively, by imaging propagating shear waves in the tissue. The speed and attenuation of waves depends on the elastic and dissipative properties of the underlying material. Tissue mechanical properties are essential for biomechanical models and simulations, and may serve as markers of disease, injury, development, or recovery. MRE is already established as a clinical technique for detecting and characterizing liver disease. The potential of MRE for diagnosing or characterizing disease in other organs, including brain, breast, and heart is an active research area. Studies involving MRE in the pre-clinical setting, in phantoms and artificial biomaterials, in the mouse, and in other mammals, are critical to the development of MRE as a robust, reliable, and useful modality.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceSoft Tissue Injuries

Identifiers

PMID29705042
PMCPMC5943171
OpenAlexW2799824116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.