Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29704662›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2018

Functional microbiomics: Evaluation of gut microbiota-bile acid metabolism interactions in health and disease.

Benjamin H Mullish, Alexandros Pechlivanis, Grace F Barker, Mark R Thursz, Julian R Marchesi, Julie A K McDonald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Carvedilol impairs bile acid homeostasis in mice: implication for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin H MullishDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Alexandros PechlivanisDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Grace F BarkerDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Mark R ThurszDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Julian R MarchesiDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Julie A K McDonaldDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: julie.mcdonald@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/R000875/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ever-increasing recognition that bile acids are not purely simple surfactant molecules that aid in lipid digestion, but are a family of molecules contributing to a diverse range of key systemic functions in the host. It is now also understood that the specific composition of the bile acid milieu within the host is related to the expression and activity of bacterially-derived enzymes within the gastrointestinal tract, as such creating a direct link between the physiology of the host and the gut microbiota. Coupled to the knowledge that perturbation of the structure and/or function of the gut microbiota may contribute to the pathogenesis of a range of diseases, there is a high level of interest in the potential for manipulation of the gut microbiota-host bile acid axis as a novel approach to therapeutics. Much of the growing understanding of the biology of this area reflects the recent development and refinement of a range of novel techniques; this study applies a number of those techniques to the analysis of human samples, aiming to illustrate their strengths, drawbacks and biological significance at all stages. Specifically, we used microbial profiling (using 16S rRNA gene sequencing), bile acid profiling (using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), bsh and baiCD qPCR, and a BSH enzyme activity assay to demonstrate differences in the gut microbiota and bile metabolism in stool samples from healthy and antibiotic-exposed individuals.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and SaltsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedSequence Analysis, RNAAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and Salts16S rRNA gene sequencingAntibioticsBileMetabonomeMicrobiotaqPCR

Identifiers

PMID29704662
PMCPMC6347095
OpenAlexW2799482346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.