Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29704395›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2018

Measuring public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to radon to inform cancer control activities and practices.

A Neri, C McNaughton, B Momin, M Puckett, M S Gallaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Beyond Communication and Risk in a Post-Pandemic World: A Survey on Radon in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radon exposure: a major cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Home Radon Testing in Rural Appalachia.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A NeriDivision of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Population Health Workforce Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Preventive Medicine Residency and Fellowship, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C McNaughtonSciMetrika LLC, Raleigh-Durham, NC, USA.
B MominDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M PuckettDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M S GallawayDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-2300

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radon exposure is the second leading risk factor for lung cancer among smokers and the leading risk factor among non-smokers. Radon concentrated in lower levels of homes/buildings can be reduced if found, thus lowering lung cancer risk. The objective of this study was to measure radon knowledge in diverse populations, with varying radon-related laws, to inform radon-related cancer control practices and activities. A survey was mailed to 3000 homebuyers who purchased single-family homes; 995 responses (33%) were received. Overall, 86% of respondents heard of radon-related health issues. Real estate agents (69%) or home inspectors (65%) were the most common sources of information. Respondents were more likely to test their home for radon if they reported previously hearing of radon-related health issues or understanding of how radon-related health issues affect the home-buying process. Respondents in states with notification policies were twice as likely as those without policies to have heard about radon-related health issues (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.27-3.17). This study provides useful information for cancer control activities including that education is positively associated with home testing for radon. It also suggests partnering with real estate agents to further radon education and testing efforts to reduce radon exposure and lung cancer risk.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAir Pollution, IndoorFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiation ExposureRadonRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesRadoncancerenvironmental carcinogenslung cancerradonrealtorssurvey

Identifiers

PMID29704395
PMCPMC6047348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.