Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29704371›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2018

Technical Assistance and Changes in Nutrition and Physical Activity Practices in the National Early Care and Education Learning Collaboratives Project, 2015-2016.

Alethea Chiappone, Teresa M Smith, Paul A Estabrooks, Cristy Geno Rasmussen, Casey Blaser, Amy L Yaroch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alethea ChiapponeGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, 8401 West Dodge Rd, Suite 100, Omaha, NE 68114. Email: achiappone@centerfornutrition.org.
Teresa M SmithGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, Nebraska.
Paul A EstabrooksCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Cristy Geno RasmussenBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Casey BlaserGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, Nebraska.
Amy L YarochGretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, Nebraska.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUDA, CHITTIBABU · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
TAKING STEPS TO HEALTHY SUCCESS: AN EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION LEARNING COLLABORATIU58DP004102 · DP · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI SHUELL, JULIE · 2012 to 2014
$11.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP004102NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE AND

objectivesThe National Early Care and Education Learning Collaboratives Project (ECELC) aims to improve best practices in early care and education (ECE) programs in topic areas of the Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment in Child Care (NAP SACC). Technical assistance is a component of the ECELC, yet its effect on outcomes is unclear. Beyond dose and duration of technical assistance, limited research exists on characteristics of technical assistance that contribute to outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify and describe technical assistance characteristics and explore associations with NAP SACC outcomes. INTERVENTION APPROACH: We collected data from 10 collaboratives comprising 84 ECE programs in 2 states in 2015-2016. The objective of technical assistance was to support programs in improving best practices. Technical assistance was provided to programs via on-site, telephone, or email and was tailored to program needs. EVALUATION

methodsWe used a mixed-methods design to examine associations between technical assistance and NAP SACC outcomes. We used multiple regression analysis to assess quantitative data and qualitative comparative analysis to determine necessary and sufficient technical assistance conditions supporting NAP SACC outcomes. We also conducted a document review to describe technical assistance that referred conditions identified by the qualitative comparative analysis.

resultsRegression analyses detected an inverse relationship between changes in NAP SACC scores and hours of technical assistance. No clear pattern emerged in the qualitative comparative analysis, leaving no necessary and sufficient conditions. However, the qualitative comparative analysis identified feedback as a potentially important component of technical assistance, whereas resource sharing and frequent email were characteristics that seemed to reduce the likelihood of improved outcomes. Email and resource sharing were considered primarily general information rather than tailored technical assistance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Technical assistance may be used in programs and made adaptable to program needs. The inclusion and evaluation of technical assistance, especially tailored approaches, is warranted for environmental interventions, including ECE settings.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaEarly Intervention, EducationalExerciseNutrition PolicyChild, PreschoolFloridaHealth PromotionHumansInfantMissouriNutritional StatusNutrition Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29704371
PMCPMC5958416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.