Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29704176›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Litter breakdown as a tool for assessment of the efficiency of afforestation and ash-aided phytostabilization on metal-contaminated soils functioning in Northern France.

Julie Leclercq-Dransart, Lucia Santorufo, Céline Pernin, Brice Louvel, Sylvain Demuynck, Fabien Grumiaux, Francis Douay, Alain Leprêtre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Anthropic Activities on Soil Quality under Different Land Uses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie Leclercq-DransartLGCgE, ISA Lille-Yncréa Hauts-de-France, Lille, France. julie.dransart@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-6357
Lucia SantorufoLGCgE, ISA Lille-Yncréa Hauts-de-France, Lille, France.
Céline PerninLGCgE, Université de Lille 1, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Brice LouvelLGCgE, ISA Lille-Yncréa Hauts-de-France, Lille, France.
Sylvain DemuynckLGCgE, Université de Lille 1, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Fabien GrumiauxLGCgE, Université de Lille 1, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Francis DouayLGCgE, ISA Lille-Yncréa Hauts-de-France, Lille, France.
Alain LeprêtreLGCgE, Université de Lille 1, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of the study was to assess the efficiency of phytoremediation methods implemented for 14 years on highly metal-contaminated soils. The different experimental strategies were plots planted with a tree mix or with a single tree species coupled or not with the use of fly-ashes as an amendment to limit metals mobility in soil. The breakdown of poplar litter on the four plots was monitored during 10 months. In parallel, colonization of litter bags by functional groups of mesofauna (Collembola and Acari) was followed. Two mesh-sized litter bags were used to allow distinguishing microbial and mesofaunal actions on the litter breakdown. We observed the breakdown of litter in four studied plots. Litter breakdown occurred faster in 3-mm litter bags than 250 μm ones during summer demonstrating the importance of mesofauna. Mixed plantation allowed faster litter breakdown than mono-specific plantation. A higher abundance of mesofauna and/or better abiotic conditions (moisture, shading…) could explain this result. Regarding litter breakdown and mesofauna, no significant difference was observed between the amended plots and those subjected to soil phytomanagement. However, communities of the studied area are disturbed since a low abundance of detritivores was observed. This could explain also the slower litter breakdown than expected in our study. To conclude, among the phytomanagement methods tested, mixed plantations could provide a benefit for the restoration of degraded soils. By contrast, the use of fly-ashes does not seem to have any effect on the functionality of ecosystem neither on the litter breakdown process nor on the abundance of mesofauna.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropodsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCoal AshEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFranceMetals, HeavyPlant LeavesSoilSoil PollutantsTreesCoal AshMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsAcariCollembolaFly-ashesLitter bag methodMetal contaminationPhytomanagementSoil functionalitySoil remediation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.