Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29703928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The effect of attention and working memory on the estimation of elapsed time.

Ignacio Polti, Benoît Martin, Virginie van Wassenhove

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Time, space, memory and brain-body rhythms.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Effects of physical effort on temporal processing.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spontaneous α Brain Dynamics Track the Episodic "When".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ignacio PoltiCEA, DRF/Joliot, NeuroSpin; INSERM, U992, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Université Paris-Sud; Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France. nachopolti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-4315
Benoît MartinCEA, DRF/Joliot, NeuroSpin; INSERM, U992, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Université Paris-Sud; Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France.
Virginie van WassenhoveCEA, DRF/Joliot, NeuroSpin; INSERM, U992, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Université Paris-Sud; Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France. virginie.van.wassenhove@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2569-5502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological models of time perception involve attention and memory: while attention typically regulates the flow of events, memory maintains timed events or intervals. The precise, and possibly distinct, roles of attention and memory in time perception remain debated. In this behavioral study, we tested 48 participants in a prospective duration estimation task while they fully attended to time or performed a working memory (WM) task. We report that paying attention to time lengthened perceived duration in the range of seconds to minutes, whereas diverting attention away from time shortened perceived duration. The overestimation due to attending to time did not scale with durations. To the contrary, increasing WM load systematically decreased subjective duration and this effect scaled with durations. Herein, we discuss the dissociation between attention and WM in timing and scalar variability from the perspective of Bayesian models of time estimations.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermAdultFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalTime PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29703928
PMCPMC5923266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.