ReviewBMJ case reports2018
Review in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- ZoonoticEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of Bordetella bronchiseptica respiratory infections in dogs diagnosed at a tertiary care institution.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Usefulness of business intelligence to guide antimicrobial treatment decision in infections by infrequent microorganism such asRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Article
- B. Bronchiseptica empyema necessitans, a case report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated highly multiplex detection system for respiratory pathogens in canines.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Mucosal Vaccination with Live AttenuatedVaccines · 2023Article
- Canine acquired pneumonia caused byIDCases · 2023Article
- Article
- Diversity in the composition of the accessory genome of Mexican Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.Genes & genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a 35-year-old quadriplegic male with confirmed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.