Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2018
Relationship Between Emergency Medical Services Response Time and Bystander Intervention in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ventricular fibrillation dynamics reveal regional asymmetry in resilience to cardiac arrest and predict clinical outcome.Cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Logistic regression and simulation modelling to evaluate survival effects of EMS response time in suspected cardiac arrest.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Shortening Time to Arrival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Implementing a Dual Dispatch Strategy of EMS and Volunteer Fire Service-A Simulation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of heavy rainfall on ambulance response time in Japan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating Telemedical Supervision, Responder Apps, and Data-Driven Triage: The RuralRescue Model of Personalized Emergency Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of Emergency Medical Service Response Time on Survival Rate of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: a 5-Year Retrospective Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Local DEA app: Saving lives with accessible and well-located automated external defibrillators.PloS one · 2025Article
- Saving Time Saves Lives: Optimizing Radio Dispatching in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.Cureus · 2024Article
- Dual-dispatch protocols and return of spontaneous circulation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide observational study.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Upholding te mana o te wā: Māori patients and their families' experiences of accessing care following an out-of-hospital cardiac event.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Impact of Heavy Snowfall on Emergency Transport and Prognosis of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: A Nation-Wide Cohort Study.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2023Article
- Current summary of the evidence in drone-based emergency medical services care.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Prehospital Time Interval for Urban and Rural Emergency Medical Services: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Influence of advanced life support response time on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient outcomes in Taipei.PloS one · 2022Article
- Predictors of problem-solving skills among emergency medical services staff in Iran: A cross-sectional correlational study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Dispatcher instructions for bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and neurologically intact survival after bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a nationwide, population-based observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Observational
- Socio-spatial disparities in access to emergency health care-A Scandinavian case study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Shortening Ambulance Response Time Increases Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Observational
- Efficacy of a five-minute compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation class compared to thirty-minute instruction among college students.Resuscitation plus · 2020Article
- Factors associated with return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Poland: a one-year retrospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe response time of emergency medical services (EMS) is an important determinant of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to identify upper limits of EMS response times and bystander interventions associated with neurologically intact survival. METHODS AND
resultsWe analyzed the records of 553 426 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a Japanese registry between 2010 and 2014. The primary study end point was 1-month neurologically intact survival (Cerebral Performance Category scale 1 or 2). Increased EMS response time was associated with significantly decreased adjusted odds of 1-month neurologically intact survival (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for each 1-minute increase, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.90), although this relationship was modified by bystander interventions. The bystander interventions and the ranges of EMS response times that were associated with increased adjusted 1-month neurologically intact survival were as follows: bystander defibrillation, from ≤2 minutes (aOR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.25-7.31]) to 13 minutes (aOR, 5.55 [95% CI, 2.66-11.2]); bystander conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation, from 3 minutes (aOR 1.48 [95% CI, 1.02-2.12]) to 11 minutes (aOR 2.41 [95% CI, 1.61-3.56]); and bystander chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation, from ≤2 minutes (aOR 1.57 [95% CI, 1.01-2.25]) to 11 minutes (aOR 1.92 [95% CI, 1.45-2.56]). However, the increase in neurologically intact survival of those receiving bystander interventions became statistically insignificant compared with no bystander interventions when the EMS response time was outside these ranges.
conclusionsThe upper limits of the EMS response times associated with improved 1-month neurologically intact survival were 13 minutes when bystanders provided defibrillation (typically with cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and 11 minutes when bystanders provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation without defibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.