Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29703713›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

The Effect of Occupational Lifting on Hypertension Risk: Protocol for a Project Using Data From the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Mette Korshøj, Harald Hannerz, Jacob Louis Marott, Peter Schnohr, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Els Clays, Andreas Holtermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette KorshøjNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-9969
Harald HannerzNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-0499
Jacob Louis MarottCopenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-4190
Peter SchnohrCopenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-0523
Eva Irene Bossano PrescottCopenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4134-0349
Els ClaysDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-945X
Andreas HoltermannNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4825-5697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is responsible for 14% of all annual deaths globally. The prevalence of hypertension varies across occupational groups, possibly affected by differences in the working environment. One work-related factor that might impose a risk for hypertension is lifting due to the acute large increases in blood pressure (BP) during lifting.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore associations between heavy occupational lifting and hypertension in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

methodsThis study will use data from the third, fourth, and fifth examination of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. The dataset contains person-based information on health as well as a large variety of biological, environmental, and lifestyle-related factors. Using a cross-sectional design, we will investigate the association between heavy occupational lifting and hypertension, defined as using antihypertensive drugs or having a measured systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg. Furthermore, in a prospective design, we will investigate the association between heavy occupational lifting and risk of becoming an SBP case, defined as the shift from not using antihypertensive drugs in examination n to use of antihypertensive drugs in examination n+1 or an above median delta value of SBP (SBP in examination n+1−SBP in examination n).

resultsIn the third examination in 1991-1994, 10,135 out of 16,560 participants attended (61.20%), in the fourth examination in 2001-2003, 6237 out of 12,599 participants attended (49.50%), and in the fifth examination in 2011-2015, 4550 out of 9765 participants attended (46.59%). On the basis of the inclusion criteria of answering to the level of occupational physical activity, 5031 observations were excluded from examination 3, 2600 from examination 4, and 1621 from examination 5. Hence, the final populations for the cross-sectional and prospective analysis are assumed to include less than 7166 participants in the cross-sectional analysis and less than 1850 participants in the prospective analysis due to the additional inclusion criteria of measured BP and use of antihypertensive drugs.

conclusionsOne-third of the workforce in Europe reports to carry or move heavy loads regularly during working hours (6th survey in Eurofound). Thus, if this study shows occupational lifting to increase the risk for hypertension, the prevention for hypertension can be improved.

Indexed as

blood pressureblue collarcardiovascular diseasescohort studyCopenhagen City Heart Studyheavy liftingmanual handlingoccupational epidemiologyoccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID29703713
PMCPMC5948412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.