ArticleBMC biology2018
InsP
Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Super-Resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy to Study Endocytosis and Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake.ACS nano · 2026Review
- The pathogenicity and future treatment strategies ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Sec10 negatively regulates antiviral immunity by downregulating NRF2-ATF4-RIG-I axis.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Article
- The multiple roles of interferon regulatory factor family in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- SEC5 is involved in M2 polarization of macrophagesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Correction to: InsPBMC biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCandida albicans (C. albicans) invasion triggers antifungal innate immunity, and the elevation of cytoplasmic Ca
resultsIn the present study, we find that during C. albicans phagocytosis in macrophages, exocyst complex component 2 (SEC5) promotes InsP
conclusionsOur data have revealed an important role of the InsP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.