ArticleBMC biology2018
Individual odour signatures that mice learn are shaped by involatile major urinary proteins (MUPs).
Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysregulated glia and periglomerular cells in the olfactory bulb and altered lipocalins in the olfactory epithelium underlie olfactory dysfunction in a murine model of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Rodent-SpecificBiology · 2025Article
- Regularity, variability, and individuality: urine marking patterns of male mice toward stimuli representing varying degrees of kinship.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Information sharing within a social network is key to behavioral flexibility-Lessons from mice tested under seminaturalistic conditions.Science advances · 2025Article
- Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Review
- Sprayed Urine Emits a Pungent Odor due to its Increased Adhesion to Vertical Objects via Urinary Proteins Rather Than to Changes in its Volatile Chemical Profile in Domestic Cats.Journal of chemical ecology · 2024Article
- Kin recognition for incest avoidance in Damaraland mole-rats,Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- The role of male scent in female attraction in the bank vole, Myodes glareolus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Proteomic analysis of horse hair extracts provides no evidence for the existence of a hypoallergenic Curly Horse breed.Clinical and translational allergy · 2024Article
- Understanding Others' Distress Through Past Experiences: The Role of Memory Engram Cells in Observational Fear.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Cryptic kin discrimination during communal lactation in mice favours cooperation between relatives.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Unraveling female communication through scent marks in the Norway rat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Variation in mouse chemical signals is genetically controlled and environmentally modulated.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Brown bear skin-borne secretions display evidence of individuality and age-sex variation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Component-Resolved Diagnosis Based on a Recombinant Variant of Mus m 1 Lipocalin Allergen.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Mammalian derived lipocalin and secretoglobin respiratory allergens strongly bind ligands with potentially immune modulating properties.Frontiers in allergy · 2022Article
- Odorant-binding proteins in canine anal sac glands indicate an evolutionarily conserved role in mammalian chemical communication.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Neural and Hormonal Basis of Opposite-Sex Preference by Chemosensory Signals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Do all mice smell the same? Chemosensory cues from inbred and wild mouse strains elicit stereotypic sensory representations in the accessory olfactory bulb.BMC biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReliable recognition of individuals requires phenotypic identity signatures that are both individually distinctive and appropriately stable over time. Individual-specific vocalisations or visual patterning are well documented among birds and some mammals, whilst odours play a key role in social recognition across many vertebrates and invertebrates. Less well understood, though, is whether individuals are recognised through variation in cues that arise incidentally from a wide variety of genetic and non-genetic differences between individuals, or whether animals evolve distinctive polymorphic signals to advertise identity reliably. As a bioassay to understand the derivation of individual-specific odour signatures, we use female attraction to the individual odours of male house mice (Mus musculus domesticus), learned on contact with a male's scent marks.
resultsLearned volatile odour signatures are determined predominantly by individual differences in involatile major urinary protein (MUP) signatures, a specialised set of communication proteins that mice secrete in their urine. Recognition of odour signatures in genetically distinct mice depended on differences in individual MUP genotype. Direct manipulation using recombinant MUPs confirmed predictable changes in volatile signature recognition according to the degree of matching between MUP profiles and the learned urine template. Both the relative amount of the male-specific MUP pheromone darcin, which induces odour learning, and other MUP isoforms influenced learned odour signatures. By contrast, odour recognition was not significantly influenced by individual major histocompatibility complex genotype. MUP profiles shape volatile odour signatures through isoform-specific differences in binding and release of urinary volatiles from scent deposits, such that volatile signatures were recognised from the urinary protein fraction alone. Manipulation using recombinant MUPs led to quantitative changes in the release of known MUP ligands from scent deposits, with MUP-specific and volatile-specific effects.
conclusionsDespite assumptions that many genes contribute to odours that can be used to recognise individuals, mice have evolved a polymorphic combinatorial MUP signature that shapes distinctive volatile signatures in their scent. Such specific signals may be more prevalent within complex body odours than previously realised, contributing to the evolution of phenotypic diversity within species. However, differences in selection may also result in species-specific constraints on the ability to recognise individuals through complex body scents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.