Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29703150›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

OMGene: mutual improvement of gene models through optimisation of evolutionary conservation.

Michael P Dunne, Steven Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. From pairwise to multiple spliced alignment.Bioinformatics advances · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael P DunneDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Steven KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. steven.kelly@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-5362

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G03706X/1H2020 European Research Council 637765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate determination of the genomic coordinates for a given gene - its gene model - is of vital importance to the utility of its annotation, and the accuracy of bioinformatic analyses derived from it. Currently-available methods of computational gene prediction, while on the whole successful, frequently disagree on the model for a given predicted gene, with some or all of the variant gene models often failing to match the biologically observed structure. Many prediction methods can be bolstered by using experimental data such as RNA-seq. However, these resources are not always available, and rarely give a comprehensive portrait of an organism's transcriptome due to temporal and tissue-specific expression profiles.

resultsOrthology between genes provides evolutionary evidence to guide the construction of gene models. OMGene (Optimise My Gene) aims to improve gene model accuracy in the absence of experimental data by optimising the consistency of multiple sequence alignments of orthologous genes from multiple species. Using RNA-seq data sets from plants, mammals, and fungi, considering intron/exon junction representation and exon coverage, and assessing the intra-orthogroup consistency of subcellular localisation predictions, we demonstrate the utility of OMGene for improving gene models in annotated genomes.

conclusionsWe show that significant improvements in the accuracy of gene model annotations can be made, both in established and in de novo annotated genomes, by leveraging information from multiple species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticSoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFungiGene Expression ProfilingGenomeGenomicsMammalsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPlantsSequence AlignmentAnnotation errorsGene modelGenome annotationOrthogroupsOrthology

Identifiers

PMID29703150
PMCPMC5923031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.