Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29702971›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Plasma rich in growth factors membrane as coadjuvant treatment in the surgery of ocular surface disorders.

Ronald M Sanchez-Avila, Jesús Merayo-Lloves, Ana C Riestra, Silvia Berisa, Carlos Lisa, José Alfonso Sánchez, Francisco Muruzabal, Gorka Orive, Eduardo Anitua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging treatment strategies in wound care.International wound journal · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Growth Factor Applied to Oral and Regenerative Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald M Sanchez-AvilaFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
Jesús Merayo-LlovesFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
Ana C RiestraFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
Silvia BerisaFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
Carlos LisaFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
José Alfonso SánchezFundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Oviedo.
Francisco MuruzabalUniversity Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology, UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua).
Gorka OriveUniversity Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology, UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua).
Eduardo AnituaUniversity Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology, UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua).
Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute · ESBiotechnology Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the surgical use of plasma rich in growth factors fibrin membrane (mPRGF) in different ocular surface pathologies.Fifteen patients with different corneal and conjunctival diseases were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to the use of mPRGF as graft (corneal and/or conjunctival) or dressing; they were also grouped according to the surgical subgroup of intervention (persistent corneal ulcer [PCU], keratoplasty, superficial keratectomy, corneal perforation, and pterygium). Best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), inflammation control time (ICT), mPRGF AT (PRGF membrane absorption time), and the healing time of the epithelial defect (HTED) were evaluated throughout the clinical follow-up time. Safety assessment was also performed reporting all adverse events.mPRGF showed a total closure of the defect in 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) and a partial closure in 2 patients (13.3%). The mean follow-up time was 11.1 ± 4.2 (4.8-22.8) months, the mean ICT was 2.5 ± 1.1 (1.0-4.0) months, the mean mPRGF AT was 12.4 ± 2.0 (10.0-16.0) days, and for the global HTED the mean was 2.9 ± 1.2 (1-4.8) months. Results showed an improvement in BCVA in all patients, with an overall improvement of 2.9 in Vision Lines. The BCVA significantly improved (P < .05) in the groups of corneal graft and dressing. In the PCU subgroup (6 patients), the healing time of epithelial defect was significantly reduced (P < .05) in patients treated only with the mPRGF in comparison to those which mPRGF therapy was associated to the amniotic membrane. The IOP remained stable (P > .05) throughout the clinical follow-up time. No adverse events were reported after mPRGF use.The mPRGF is effective and safe as coadjuvant treatment in surgeries related with ocular surface disorders, being an alternative to the use of amniotic membrane. The mPRGF accelerates tissue regeneration after ocular surface surgery thus minimizing inflammation and fibrosis.

Indexed as

Biological DressingsAgedAged, 80 and overAmnionEye DiseasesFemaleFibrinHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPlatelet-Rich PlasmaRetrospective StudiesTissue TransplantationVisual AcuityFibrinIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29702971
PMCPMC5944476
OpenAlexW2799506187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.