Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29702677›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Acceptability of oral rapid HIV testing at dental clinics in communities with high HIV prevalence in South Florida.

Erin L P Bradley, Denise C Vidot, Zaneta Gaul, Madeline Y Sutton, Margaret Pereyra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L P BradleyDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Centers for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-9145
Denise C VidotSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Zaneta GaulICF, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Madeline Y SuttonDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Centers for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Margaret PereyraSociomedical Sciences at the Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USICF International (United States) · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

CDC HHS 1U01PS003321NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS003321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding HIV screening for populations at risk necessitates testing in nontraditional settings. We assessed HIV testing in dental clinics in South Florida, an urban area with the highest rates of HIV diagnoses in the United States in 2015.

aimsWe explored patients' acceptance of oral HIV rapid tests administered by dental providers and identified reasons for accepting or declining HIV testing.

methodsDuring 2014 and 2015, dentists and hygienists at two federally qualified health center (FQHC) dental clinics who serve racial/ethnic minority patient populations in South Florida were trained to administer oral HIV rapid tests as a part of a routine dental visit. Patients presenting for dental services were offered a rapid HIV test and brief survey regarding their demographics, HIV testing history and behaviors.

resultsWe enrolled 600 patients (median age = 43 years; IQR: 29-56 years), 45% non-Hispanic black and 35% Hispanic/Latino, 83% graduated high school, and 50% unemployed. Most (85%) accepted oral HIV rapid testing (none tested HIV-positive); 14% had never been tested for HIV. The most common reasons for testing were a desire to know HIV status (56%) and free testing (54%). Among 93 (15%) patients who declined testing, 58% were tested recently and 31% felt confident that they were HIV-negative; however, 74 (80%) who declined testing said they would feel comfortable discussing HIV prevention with their dentist. Additionally, 290 of 600 patients (48%) reported condomless vaginal or anal sex in the past 6 months. Further, among 119 patients who had condomless sex with an HIV-positive partner and/or one whose HIV status was unknown, 98 (82%) accepted the oral HIV test.

conclusionDental clinics may provide expanded opportunities for oral HIV rapid testing and conversations about HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence communities.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDental ClinicsDentistsFemaleFloridaHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalencePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29702677
PMCPMC5922539
OpenAlexW2801422011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.