ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Effects of growth rate, cell size, motion, and elemental stoichiometry on nutrient transport kinetics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- More realistic plankton simulation models will improve projections of ocean ecosystem responses to global change.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Review
- Resource acquisition in diel cycles and the cost of growing quickly.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Biogeochemical Traits of a High Latitude South Pacific Ocean Calcareous Nannoplankton Community During the Oligocene.Paleoceanography and paleoclimatology · 2024Article
- Predictions of rhizosphere microbiome dynamics with a genome-informed and trait-based energy budget model.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- Multiscale Modeling of Spheroid Tumors: Effect of Nutrient Availability on Tumor Evolution.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Characterization of the molecular mechanisms of silicon uptake in coccolithophores.Environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- 'Boom-and-busted' dynamics of phytoplankton-virus interactions explain the paradox of the plankton.The New phytologist · 2022Article
- Impact of Nitrate and Ammonium Concentrations on Co-Culturing of Tetradesmus obliquus IS2 with Variovorax paradoxus IS1 as Revealed by Phenotypic Responses.Microbial ecology · 2022Article
- Micronutrient content drives elementome variability amongst the Symbiodiniaceae.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Ammonia-oxidizing archaea possess a wide range of cellular ammonia affinities.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Phytoplankton community structuring in the absence of resource-based competitive exclusion.PloS one · 2022Article
- Multiple global change stressor effects on phytoplankton nutrient acquisition in a future ocean.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Exploring evolution of maximum growth rates in plankton.Journal of plankton researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutrient acquisition is a critical determinant for the competitive advantage for auto- and osmohetero- trophs alike. Nutrient limited growth is commonly described on a whole cell basis through reference to a maximum growth rate (Gmax) and a half-saturation constant (KG). This empirical application of a Michaelis-Menten like description ignores the multiple underlying feedbacks between physiology contributing to growth, cell size, elemental stoichiometry and cell motion. Here we explore these relationships with reference to the kinetics of the nutrient transporter protein, the transporter rate density at the cell surface (TRD; potential transport rate per unit plasma-membrane area), and diffusion gradients. While the half saturation value for the limiting nutrient increases rapidly with cell size, significant mitigation is afforded by cell motion (swimming or sedimentation), and by decreasing the cellular carbon density. There is thus potential for high vacuolation and high sedimentation rates in diatoms to significantly decrease KG and increase species competitive advantage. Our results also suggest that Gmax for larger non-diatom protists may be constrained by rates of nutrient transport. For a given carbon density, cell size and TRD, the value of Gmax/KG remains constant. This implies that species or strains with a lower Gmax might coincidentally have a competitive advantage under nutrient limited conditions as they also express lower values of KG. The ability of cells to modulate the TRD according to their nutritional status, and hence change the instantaneous maximum transport rate, has a very marked effect upon transport and growth kinetics. Analyses and dynamic models that do not consider such modulation will inevitably fail to properly reflect competitive advantage in nutrient acquisition. This has important implications for the accurate representation and predictive capabilities of model applications, in particular in a changing environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.