Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29702640›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Transcription and translation of the sigG gene is tuned for proper execution of the switch from early to late gene expression in the developing Bacillus subtilis spore.

Elizabeth B Mearls, Jacquelin Jackter, Jennifer M Colquhoun, Veronica Farmer, Allison J Matthews, Laura S Murphy, Colleen Fenton, Amy H Camp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clostridioides difficile Sporulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. The alternative sigma factor SigN ofJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Many Messenger RNAs Can Be Translated by the START Mechanism?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth B MearlsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.
Jacquelin JackterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.
Jennifer M ColquhounDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Veronica FarmerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3857-5793
Allison J MatthewsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.
Laura S MurphyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.
Colleen FentonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.
Amy H CampDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2398-6402
Mount Holyoke College · USLehigh University · US

Funding

A Switch in Gene Expression During Bacterial DevelopmentR15GM101559 · NIGMS · MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE · PI CAMP, AMY HITCHCOCK · 2012 to 2012
$276k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM101559NIH HHS R15 GM101559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cascade of alternative sigma factors directs developmental gene expression during spore formation by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. As the spore develops, a tightly regulated switch occurs in which the early-acting sigma factor σF is replaced by the late-acting sigma factor σG. The gene encoding σG (sigG) is transcribed by σF and by σG itself in an autoregulatory loop; yet σG activity is not detected until σF-dependent gene expression is complete. This separation in σF and σG activities has been suggested to be due at least in part to a poorly understood intercellular checkpoint pathway that delays sigG expression by σF. Here we report the results of a careful examination of sigG expression during sporulation. Unexpectedly, our findings argue against the existence of a regulatory mechanism to delay sigG transcription by σF and instead support a model in which sigG is transcribed by σF with normal timing, but at levels that are very low. This low-level expression of sigG is the consequence of several intrinsic features of the sigG regulatory and coding sequence-promoter spacing, secondary structure potential of the mRNA, and start codon identity-that dampen its transcription and translation. Especially notable is the presence of a conserved hairpin in the 5' leader sequence of the sigG mRNA that occludes the ribosome-binding site, reducing translation by up to 4-fold. Finally, we demonstrate that misexpression of sigG from regulatory and coding sequences lacking these features triggers premature σG activity in the forespore during sporulation, as well as inappropriate σG activity during vegetative growth. Altogether, these data indicate that transcription and translation of the sigG gene is tuned to prevent vegetative expression of σG and to ensure the precise timing of the switch from σF to σG in the developing spore.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialInverted Repeat SequencesModels, GeneticNucleic Acid ConformationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BiosynthesisRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerSigma FactorSignal TransductionSpores, BacterialTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsFliA protein, BacteriaRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID29702640
PMCPMC5942855
OpenAlexW2800706934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.