ArticleThe Permanente journal2018
A Patient-Centered Approach to a Rural General Practice in Distress and the Search for a Solution.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing patients' rate of frequent attendance through a training intervention for physicians.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessing the Feasibility of Rural Residency Training for Licensed Naturopathic Physicians in the Northwest: A Qualitative Study.Integrative medicine reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextA general practice in rural UK (Cumbria) was overwhelmed by staff burnout.
objectiveTo present a case study for how the staff of a practice came together, used data, agreed on a plan for improvement, implemented the plan, improved subjective distress, and objectively evaluated the intervention.
designWe conducted an audit using the electronic health record for patients coming to the practice 5 or more times annually from 2008 to 2012 (frequent attenders). We planned an intervention to reduce utilization (frequency of visits) while still serving patients. The intervention used a genogram, psychoeducation, and up to six 30-minute sessions of solutions-focused psychotherapy, in which difficult interpersonal relationships were identified and efforts were made to resolve 1 major problem related to those relationships.
main outcome measuresQuantitative data (number of visits per year) and qualitative data about the changes that resulted in the practice from the audit and the intervention.
resultsThe frequency of visits for patients with mental health conditions (41.0% of all frequent attenders in the practice) dropped significantly from 2007 to 2012 (p = 0.019; initial visits per year, 10.0, standard deviation = 2.51; final visits per year = 5.6, standard deviation = 3.8). The frequency of visits for patients without mental health diagnoses did not change.
conclusionIntervening with frequent attenders of primary care who have mental health conditions improved their symptoms and reduced their health care utilization, with beneficial impact on practitioners and improvement in the morale of the staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.