Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29701825›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Predicting gene structure changes resulting from genetic variants via exon definition features.

William H Majoros, Carson Holt, Michael S Campbell, Doreen Ware, Mark Yandell, Timothy E Reddy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polymorphism rs259983 of theThe Egyptian journal of medical human genetics · 2025
    Article
  2. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William H MajorosProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Carson HoltDepartment of Human Genetics, Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah and School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Michael S CampbellCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Doreen WareCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Mark YandellDepartment of Human Genetics, Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah and School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Timothy E ReddyProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Utah · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USCornell University · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
VAAST+: Tool for variant prioritization, risk assessment and disease-gene findingR01GM104390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JORDE, LYNN, YANDELL, MARK DOUGLAS · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
Genetics and Genomics of Maternal Glycemia During PregnancyR01DK097534 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LOWE, WILLIAM L · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
Genetics and Evolution of Fetal Human Fat Accretion During DevelopmentR01DK099820 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LOWE, WILLIAM L · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Data commons for 'omic, microscopy and analysis core facilitiesS10OD018164 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRAY, GREGORY A. · 2014 to 2014
$598k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097534NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099820NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104390NIH HHS S10 OD018164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Genetic variation that disrupts gene function by altering gene splicing between individuals can substantially influence traits and disease. In those cases, accurately predicting the effects of genetic variation on splicing can be highly valuable for investigating the mechanisms underlying those traits and diseases. While methods have been developed to generate high quality computational predictions of gene structures in reference genomes, the same methods perform poorly when used to predict the potentially deleterious effects of genetic changes that alter gene splicing between individuals. Underlying that discrepancy in predictive ability are the common assumptions by reference gene finding algorithms that genes are conserved, well-formed and produce functional proteins. Results: We describe a probabilistic approach for predicting recent changes to gene structure that may or may not conserve function. The model is applicable to both coding and non-coding genes, and can be trained on existing gene annotations without requiring curated examples of aberrant splicing. We apply this model to the problem of predicting altered splicing patterns in the genomes of individual humans, and we demonstrate that performing gene-structure prediction without relying on conserved coding features is feasible. The model predicts an unexpected abundance of variants that create de novo splice sites, an observation supported by both simulations and empirical data from RNA-seq experiments. While these de novo splice variants are commonly misinterpreted by other tools as coding or non-coding variants of little or no effect, we find that in some cases they can have large effects on splicing activity and protein products and we propose that they may commonly act as cryptic factors in disease. Availability and implementation: The software is available from geneprediction.org/SGRF. Supplementary information: Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

ExonsRNA SplicingSoftwareHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID29701825
PMCPMC6198862
OpenAlexW2800764148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.