Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29701682›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2018

Circulating MicroRNA Biomarkers in Melanoma: Tools and Challenges in Personalised Medicine.

Sophie L Mumford, Benjamin P Towler, Amy L Pashler, Onur Gilleard, Yella Martin, Sarah F Newbury

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Omics in Cutaneous Melanoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metastatic Melanoma: Liquid Biopsy as a New Precision Medicine Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie L MumfordMedical Research Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK. s.mumford@bsms.ac.uk.
Benjamin P TowlerMedical Research Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK. b.towler@bsms.ac.uk.
Amy L PashlerMedical Research Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK. a.l.pashler@bsms.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8663
Onur GilleardPathology and Pharmacy Building at The Royal London Hospital, 80 Newark Street, London E1 2ES, UK. onurgilleard@aol.com.
Yella MartinHuxley Building, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK. y.martin@brighton.ac.uk.
Sarah F NewburyMedical Research Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK. s.newbury@bsms.ac.uk.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P021042/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective management of melanoma depends heavily on early diagnosis. When detected in early non-metastatic stages, melanoma is almost 100% curable by surgical resection, however when detected in late metastatic stages III and IV, 5-year survival rates drop to ~50% and 10⁻25%, respectively, due to limited efficacy of current treatment options. This presents a pressing need to identify biomarkers that can detect patients at high risk of recurrence and progression to metastatic disease, which will allow for early intervention and survival benefit. Accumulating evidence over the past few decades has highlighted the potential use of circulating molecular biomarkers for melanoma diagnosis and prognosis, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments. Since 2010, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been increasingly recognised as more robust non-invasive biomarkers for melanoma due to their structural stability under the harsh conditions of the blood and different conditions of sample processing and isolation. Several pre-analytical and analytical variables challenge the accurate quantification of relative miRNA levels between serum samples or plasma samples, leading to conflicting findings between studies on circulating miRNA biomarkers for melanoma. In this review, we provide a critical summary of the circulating miRNA biomarkers for melanoma published to date.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHumansMelanomaMicroRNAsPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsMicroRNAscirculating biomarkersdiagnostic biomarkersexosomesmelanomamicroRNAsprognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29701682
PMCPMC6022922
OpenAlexW2802741981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.