Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29701107›Full record

Observational studyIntegrative cancer therapies2018

Do Women With Breast Cancer Who Choose Adjunctive Integrative Oncology Care Receive Different Standard Oncologic Treatment?

Leanna J Standish, Fred Dowd, Erin Sweet, Linda Dale, M Robyn Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Integrative cancer therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leanna J Standish1 Bastyr University Research Institute, Kenmore, WA, USA.
Fred Dowd1 Bastyr University Research Institute, Kenmore, WA, USA.
Erin Sweet1 Bastyr University Research Institute, Kenmore, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4840-6125
Linda Dale1 Bastyr University Research Institute, Kenmore, WA, USA.
M Robyn Andersen2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-4619
Bastyr University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Training in Complementary and Alternative Medical ResearchT32AT000815 · NCCIH · BASTYR UNIVERSITY · PI STANDISH, LEANNA J · 2002 to 2011
$3.2M
Breast Cancer Integrative Oncology: Prospective Matched Controlled Outcomes StudyR01AT005873 · NCCIH · BASTYR UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, MARIN R, STANDISH, LEANNA J · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005873NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT000815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if women with breast cancer who choose adjunctive naturopathic oncology (NO) specialty care receive different standard oncologic treatment when compared with breast cancer patients who receive only standard care.

participantsWomen with breast cancer stages 0 to 4, aged 18+ who spoke English and sought care from outpatient naturopathic doctor clinics were enrolled in an observational study of clinical and quality of life outcomes. Women who sought NO care 2 or more times within the first 2 years postdiagnosis were identified as NO cases. A matched comparison group of breast cancer patients were identified using the Western Washington Cancer Surveillance System(CSS).

methodsA longitudinal cohort design. In addition to self-report data, the CSS provided data on demographics, stage at the time of diagnosis, and initial treatment. Oncology medical records were abstracted in order to provide additional information on standard oncologic treatment for all participants.

resultsCohorts were well matched with regard to demographic, histologic, and prognostic indicators at the time of diagnosis. Approximately 70% of women in both cohorts received standard oncologic care that met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. There were no statistically significant differences between the cohorts in treatment received. Fewer women in the NO cohort with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer appear to have received antiestrogen therapy.

conclusionsWomen in both cohorts appear to receive guideline-concordant care. However, women who receive adjunctive NO care may be less likely to receive antiestrogen therapy.

Indexed as

Integrative OncologyStandard of CareAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingSurveys and QuestionnairesWashingtonbreast cancercomplementary and alternative medicineintegrative oncologyobservational study

Identifiers

PMID29701107
PMCPMC6142072
OpenAlexW2799420774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.