Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700893›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Action and semantic tool knowledge - Effective connectivity in the underlying neural networks.

Nina N Kleineberg, Anna Dovern, Ellen Binder, Christian Grefkes, Simon B Eickhoff, Gereon R Fink, Peter H Weiss

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nina N KleinebergCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-878X
Anna DovernCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Germany.
Ellen BinderDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Christian GrefkesCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1656-720X
Simon B EickhoffInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gereon R FinkCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Germany.
Peter H WeissCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Germany.

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
Meta-analysis in human brain mappingR56MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2020 to 2020
$543k
Helmholtz Portfolio Theme "Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain"Marga- and Walter-Boll StiftungMedical Faculty, University of Cologne 3615/0129/31NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH074457University of Cologne Emerging Groups Initiative (CONNECT group) implemented into the Institutional Strategy of the University of Cologne and the German Excellence Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from neuropsychological and imaging studies indicate that action and semantic knowledge about tools draw upon distinct neural substrates, but little is known about the underlying interregional effective connectivity. With fMRI and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) we investigated effective connectivity in the left-hemisphere (LH) while subjects performed (i) a function knowledge and (ii) a value knowledge task, both addressing semantic tool knowledge, and (iii) a manipulation (action) knowledge task. Overall, the results indicate crosstalk between action nodes and semantic nodes. Interestingly, effective connectivity was weakened between semantic nodes and action nodes during the manipulation task. Furthermore, pronounced modulations of effective connectivity within the fronto-parietal action system of the LH (comprising lateral occipito-temporal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, supramarginal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus) were observed in a bidirectional manner during the processing of action knowledge. In contrast, the function and value knowledge tasks resulted in a significant strengthening of the effective connectivity between visual cortex and fusiform gyrus. Importantly, this modulation was present in both semantic tasks, indicating that processing different aspects of semantic knowledge about tools evokes similar effective connectivity patterns. Data revealed that interregional effective connectivity during the processing of tool knowledge occurred in a bidirectional manner with a weakening of connectivity between areas engaged in action and semantic knowledge about tools during the processing of action knowledge. Moreover, different semantic tool knowledge tasks elicited similar effective connectivity patterns.

Indexed as

ConnectomeSemanticsAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexDominance, CerebralEquipment and SuppliesFemaleHandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPsychomotor PerformanceTool Use BehaviorYoung Adultaction representationsapraxiadynamic causal modelingeffective connectivitylateral occipito-temporal cortexparietal lobetool knowledgevisuo-motor streams

Identifiers

PMID29700893
PMCPMC6866288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.