Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700850›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Using data from multiple studies to develop a child growth correlation matrix.

Craig Anderson, Luo Xiao, William Checkley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correlation models for monitoring fetal growth.Statistical methods in medical research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Four papers on child growth modelling.Statistics in medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Craig AndersonSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1554-5727
Luo XiaoDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-0914
William CheckleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, the monitoring of child growth does not occur in a regular manner, and instead, we may have to rely on sporadic observations that are subject to substantial measurement error. In these countries, it can be difficult to identify patterns of poor growth, and faltering children may miss out on essential health interventions. The contribution of this paper is to provide a framework for pooling together multiple datasets, thus allowing us to overcome the issue of sparse data and provide improved estimates of growth. We use data from multiple longitudinal growth studies to construct a common correlation matrix that can be used in estimation and prediction of child growth. We propose a novel 2-stage approach: In stage 1, we construct a raw matrix via a set of univariate meta-analyses, and in stage 2, we smooth this raw matrix to obtain a more realistic correlation matrix. The methodology is illustrated using data from 16 child growth studies from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's Healthy Birth Growth and Development knowledge integration project and identifies strong correlation for both height and weight between the ages of 4 and 12 years. We use a case study to provide an example of how this matrix can be used to help compute growth measures.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicBody HeightBody WeightChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleGrowthGrowth ChartsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalechild healthcorrelationgrowthSDS

Identifiers

PMID29700850
PMCPMC6767589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.