Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700789›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2018

Pay-for-Performance and Veteran Care in the VHA and the Community: a Systematic Review.

Karli K Kondo, Jessica Wyse, Aaron Mendelson, Gabriella Beard, Michele Freeman, Allison Low, Devan Kansagara

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pay-for-performance challenges in family physician program.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karli K KondoPortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA. Karli.Kondo@va.gov.
Jessica WysePortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA.
Aaron MendelsonOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Gabriella BeardPortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA.
Michele FreemanPortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA.
Allison LowPortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA.
Devan KansagaraPortland VA Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland, OR, USA.
Portland VA Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pay-for-performance (P4P) strategies have been used by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for over a decade, the long-term benefits of P4P are unclear. The use of P4P is further complicated by the increased use of non-VHA healthcare providers as part of the Veterans Choice Program. We conducted a systematic review and key informant interviews to better understand the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of P4P, as well as the implementation factors and design features important in both VHA and non-VHA/community settings.

methodsWe searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL through March 2017 and reviewed reference lists. We included trials and observational studies of P4P targeting Veteran health. Two investigators abstracted data and assessed study quality. We interviewed VHA stakeholders to gain further insight.

resultsThe literature search yielded 1031 titles and abstracts, of which 30 studies met pre-specified inclusion criteria. Twenty-five examined P4P in VHA settings and 5 in community settings. There was no strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of P4P in VHA settings. Interviews with 17 key informants were consistent with studies that identified the potential for overtreatment associated with performance metrics in the VHA. Key informants' views on P4P in community settings included the need to develop relationships with providers and health systems with records of strong performance, to improve coordination by targeting documentation and data sharing processes, and to troubleshoot the limited impact of P4P among practices where Veterans make up a small fraction of the patient population. DISCUSSION: The evidence to support the effectiveness of P4P on Veteran health is limited. Key informants recognize the potential for unintended consequences, such as overtreatment in VHA settings, and suggest that implementation of P4P in the community focus on relationship building and target areas such as documentation and coordination of care.

Indexed as

VeteransCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHumansReimbursement, IncentiveUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairsfinancial incentivesimplementationpay for performanceperformance metricssystematic reviewVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29700789
PMCPMC6025676
OpenAlexW2799377721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.