Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700761›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Development and first evaluation of a novel multiplex real-time PCR on whole blood samples for rapid pathogen identification in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Kirsten van de Groep, Martine P Bos, Paul H M Savelkoul, Anna Rubenjan, Christel Gazenbeek, Willem J G Melchers, Tom van der Poll, Nicole P Juffermans, David S Y Ong, Marc J M Bonten and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Performance of Molecular Culture ID in diagnosis of bacterial pericarditis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid Diagnostics of Joint Infections Using IS-Pro.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Point-of-critical-care diagnostics for sepsis enabled by multiplexed micro and nanosensing technologies.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. A high leukocyte count and administration of hydrocortisone hamper PCR-based diagnostics for bloodstream infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Mass Spectrometry Proteotyping-Based Detection and Identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Moderate positive predictive value of a multiplex real-time PCR on whole blood for pathogen detection in critically ill patients with sepsis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kirsten van de GroepDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. k.vandegroep-3@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-7630
Martine P BosMicrobiome, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul H M SavelkoulMicrobiome, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna RubenjanMicrobiome, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christel GazenbeekMicrobiome, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Willem J G MelchersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Tom van der PollCenter of Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nicole P JuffermansDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David S Y OngDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Room F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc J M BontenDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Olaf L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Room F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
MARS consortium
Utrecht University · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

Center for Translational Molecular Medicine 041-201 and 09P-107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular tests may enable early adjustment of antimicrobial therapy and be complementary to blood culture (BC) which has imperfect sensitivity in critically ill patients. We evaluated a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay to diagnose bloodstream pathogens directly in whole blood samples (BSI-PCR). BSI-PCR included 11 species- and four genus-specific PCRs, a molecular Gram-stain PCR, and two antibiotic resistance markers. We collected 5 mL blood from critically ill patients simultaneously with clinically indicated BC. Microbial DNA was isolated using the Polaris method followed by automated DNA extraction. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using BC as reference. BSI-PCR was evaluated in 347 BC-positive samples (representing up to 50 instances of each pathogen covered by the test) and 200 BC-negative samples. Bacterial species-specific PCR sensitivities ranged from 65 to 100%. Sensitivity was 26% for the Gram-positive PCR, 32% for the Gram-negative PCR, and ranged 0 to 7% for yeast PCRs. Yeast detection was improved to 40% in a smaller set-up. There was no overall association between BSI-PCR sensitivity and time-to-positivity of BC (which was highly variable), yet Ct-values were lower for true-positive versus false-positive PCR results. False-positive results were observed in 84 (4%) of the 2200 species-specific PCRs in 200 culture-negative samples, and ranged from 0 to 6% for generic PCRs. Sensitivity of BSI-PCR was promising for individual bacterial pathogens, but still insufficient for yeasts and generic PCRs. Further development of BSI-PCR will focus on improving sensitivity by increasing input volumes and on subsequent implementation as a bedside test.

Indexed as

CandidaCritical IllnessDNA, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisDNA, BacterialBloodstream infectionDiagnosisIntensive careMultiplex real-time PCRSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29700761
PMCPMC6015113
OpenAlexW2799657722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.