ArticleJournal of community genetics2019
Primary care providers' lived experiences of genetics in practice.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of geographical inequities for accessing clinical genomic and genetic services for non-cancer related rare disease.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Pooled it
- Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis.Pharmacogenomics · 2022Pooled it
- Genomic medicine knowledge, self-assessment, and training needs among Turkish pediatricians: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives and Demographic Factors Influencing Non-Participation in a Large Genomics Study.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Cancer genetic testing uptake in the primary care setting: Patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators throughout the testing process.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- What kind of information is requested by patients and families with genetic disorders? : The analysis of an online patient community in South Korea.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Identification of Patients at Elevated Cancer Risk through a Community-Based Genetic Testing Program.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Decision makers' perceptions of integrating genetic counselors into primary care.Family practice · 2025Article
- The case for integrating genetic counselors into primary care: A paradigm shift for our profession.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Assessing the unmet needs of genomic testing in Australia: a geospatial exploration.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Expanding the primary care workforce by integrating genetic counselors in multidisciplinary care teams.Family practice · 2025Article
- Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.Critical public health · 2025Review
- Validation of a guidelines-based digital tool to assess the need for germline cancer genetic testing.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Training of community health agents - a strategy for earlier recognition of mucopolysaccharidoses.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic literacy among primary care physicians in a resource-constrained setting.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Returning actionable genetic results to participants in the biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine and UCHealth.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To effectively translate genetic advances into practice, engagement of primary care providers (PCPs) is essential. Using a qualitative, phenomenological methodology, we analyzed key informant interviews and focus groups designed to explore perspectives of urban and rural PCPs. PCPs endorsed a responsibility to integrate genetics into their practices and expected advances in genetic medicine to expand. However, PCPs reported limited knowledge and difficulties accessing resources, experts, and continuing education. Rural practitioners' additional concerns included cost, distance, and poor patient engagement. PCPs' perspectives are crucial to develop relevant educational and systems-based interventions to further expand genetic medicine in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.