Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700709›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2018

The Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) as an Enzootic Reservoir of Plague in California.

Mary Danforth, James Tucker, Mark Novak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring and Mitigating Plague for One Health Purposes.Current tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary DanforthCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 8633 Bond Rd, Elk Grove, CA, 95624, USA. mary.danforth@cdph.ca.gov.
James TuckerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 8633 Bond Rd, Elk Grove, CA, 95624, USA.
Mark NovakCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 8633 Bond Rd, Elk Grove, CA, 95624, USA.
California Department of Public Health · USVector (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been theorized that deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) are a primary reservoir of Yersinia pestis in California. However, recent research from other parts of the western USA has implicated deer mice as spillover hosts during epizootic plague transmission. This retrospective study analyzed deer mouse data collected for plague surveillance by public health agencies in California from 1971 to 2016 to help elucidate the role of deer mice in plague transmission. The fleas most commonly found on deer mice were poor vectors of Y. pestis and occurred in insufficient numbers to maintain transmission of the pathogen, while fleas whose natural hosts are deer mice were rarely observed and even more rarely found infected with Y. pestis on other rodent hosts. Seroprevalence of Y. pestis antibodies in deer mice was significantly lower than that of several chipmunk and squirrel species. These analyses suggest that it is unlikely that deer mice play an important role in maintaining plague transmission in California. While they may not be primary reservoirs, results supported the premise that deer mice are occasionally exposed to and infected by Y. pestis and instead may be spillover hosts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaliforniaDisease OutbreaksDisease ReservoirsMicePeromyscusPlagueRetrospective StudiesRodent DiseasesSeroepidemiologic StudiesYersinia pestisZoonosesCaliforniaPeromyscus maniculatusSylvatic plagueVector-borne diseaseYersinia pestisZoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID29700709
OpenAlexW2802074147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.