Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700578›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2018

Specialised DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli: roles within multiple pathways.

Sarah S Henrikus, Antoine M van Oijen, Andrew Robinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The RecBC complex protects single-stranded DNA gaps during lesion bypass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Sending out an SOS - the bacterial DNA damage response.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah S HenrikusMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Antoine M van OijenMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Andrew RobinsonMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia. andrewr@uow.edu.au.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP180100858Australian Research Council FL140100027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many bacterial species, DNA damage triggers the SOS response; a pathway that regulates the production of DNA repair and damage tolerance proteins, including error-prone DNA polymerases. These specialised polymerases are capable of bypassing lesions in the template DNA, a process known as translesion synthesis (TLS). Specificity for lesion types varies considerably between the different types of TLS polymerases. TLS polymerases are mainly described as working in the context of replisomes that are stalled at lesions or in lesion-containing gaps left behind the replisome. Recently, a series of single-molecule fluorescence microscopy studies have revealed that two TLS polymerases, pol IV and pol V, rarely colocalise with replisomes in Escherichia coli cells, suggesting that most TLS activity happens in a non-replisomal context. In this review, we re-visit the evidence for the involvement of TLS polymerases in other pathways. A series of genetic and biochemical studies indicates that TLS polymerases could participate in nucleotide excision repair, homologous recombination and transcription. In addition, oxidation of the nucleotide pool, which is known to be induced by multiple stressors, including many antibiotics, appears to favour TLS polymerase activity and thus increases mutation rates. Ultimately, participation of TLS polymerases within non-replisomal pathways may represent a major source of mutations in bacterial cells and calls for more extensive investigation.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA repairDNA replicationMutagenesisReactive oxygen speciesRecombination

Identifiers

PMID29700578
OpenAlexW2802813826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.