Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700577›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.

Jean-Paul Noel, Kahan Modi, Mark T Wallace, Nathan Van der Stoep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontier of Self and Impact Prediction.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean-Paul NoelNeuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3363
Kahan ModiVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Mark T WallaceVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-906X
Nathan Van der StoepDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. N.vanderStoep@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-2078

Funding

Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Peripersonal Space Representation as a Basis for Social Deficits in Autism and Schizophrenia Spectrum DisordersR21MH109225 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASCIO, CARISSA J, WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2016 to 2017
$435k
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health HD083211National Institutes of Health MH109225NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH109225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of information across sensory modalities is dependent on the spatiotemporal characteristics of the stimuli that are paired. Despite large variation in the distance over which events occur in our environment, relatively little is known regarding how stimulus-observer distance affects multisensory integration. Prior work has suggested that exteroceptive stimuli are integrated over larger temporal intervals in near relative to far space, and that larger multisensory facilitations are evident in far relative to near space. Here, we sought to examine the interrelationship between these previously established distance-related features of multisensory processing. Participants performed an audiovisual simultaneity judgment and redundant target task in near and far space, while audiovisual stimuli were presented at a range of temporal delays (i.e., stimulus onset asynchronies). In line with the previous findings, temporal acuity was poorer in near relative to far space. Furthermore, reaction time to asynchronously presented audiovisual targets suggested a temporal window for fast detection-a range of stimuli asynchronies that was also larger in near as compared to far space. However, the range of reaction times over which multisensory response enhancement was observed was limited to a restricted range of relatively small (i.e., 150 ms) asynchronies, and did not differ significantly between near and far space. Furthermore, for synchronous presentations, these distance-related (i.e., near vs. far) modulations in temporal acuity and multisensory gain correlated negatively at an individual subject level. Thus, the findings support the conclusion that multisensory temporal binding and gain are asymmetrically modulated as a function of distance from the observer, and specifies that this relationship is specific for temporally synchronous audiovisual stimulus presentations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAuditory PerceptionCorrelation of DataDistance PerceptionFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePhotic StimulationPsychophysicsReaction TimeTime FactorsVisual PerceptionAudiovisualDepthGainMultisensory IntegrationSpaceTemporal-binding window

Identifiers

PMID29700577
PMCPMC6010498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.