ArticleDer Pathologe2018
[The new S3 guideline "Prevention of cervical carcinoma" : What is important for pathology?]
Article in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Of the numerous aspects involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cervical uterine precursor lesions, epidemiology, virology, cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and diagnostic algorithms for equivocal and HPV-positive findings are important for pathologists. Cytology will continue to be used as a preventive medical check-up in young women, while HPV-based screening is suggested for older women. HPV screening has yielded a significant reduction in cancer precursors and invasive cervical carcinoma in numerous studies. In contrast to the sensitivity, the specificity of the HPV test is inferior to that of cytology and the morphological biomarker p16/Ki-67, so that they are suitable as methods in the triage of HPV-positive findings. Cytological abnormalities and mildly dysplastic changes could be further clarified by an HPV test or the p16/Ki-67 test. The HPV test should also be used in the follow-up of patients after conization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.