ArticleLeukemia2018
Minimal residual disease analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a way for achieving more personalized treatments.
Article in Leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 2020: a surfeit of riches?Leukemia · 2020Review
- Evolution in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: should MRD negativity be the goal?International journal of hematology · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic approaches for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have dramatically changed over the recent past. In parallel, quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) proved to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival. The European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) in collaboration with American and Australasian partners developed harmonised assays that could be applied reproducibly to compare the efficacy of different treatments. The potential for MRD analysis to identify the most effective treatments prior to reaching survival endpoints was recognised by regulatory agencies and approved as an intermediate endpoint for licensure in randomized studies, in Europe. More recently treatment approaches have evolved, in particular with BCL2-pathway inhibitors, so that MRD analysis may be informative for most patients and clinical trials, potentially becoming a tool for managing CLL patients in clinical practice. In the recent past the importance of the type of MRD assay used, the most appropriate timing and compartment to assess for different treatment types have been learnt as we move towards eradicating residual disease beyond the guideline threshold of one cell in ten thousand. Nowadays, MRD assessment in CLL has quickly become an indispensable tool for clinical research and development that promise to change the way we manage our patients in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29700386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.