Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29700356›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Incidence and predictors of readmission within 30 days of transurethral resection of the prostate: a single center European experience.

Franco Palmisano, Luca Boeri, Matteo Fontana, Andrea Gallioli, Elisa De Lorenzis, Stefano Paolo Zanetti, Gianluca Sampogna, Matteo Giulio Spinelli, Giancarlo Albo, Fabrizio Longo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Returning to the emergency room: An analysis of emergency encounters following urological outpatient surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Franco PalmisanoIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Luca BoeriIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy. dr.lucaboeri@gmail.com.
Matteo FontanaIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7017-6576
Andrea GallioliIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Elisa De LorenzisIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Stefano Paolo ZanettiIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca SampognaIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Matteo Giulio SpinelliIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo AlboIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio LongoIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Franco GaddaIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6001-1252
Paolo Guido Dell'OrtoIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele MontanariIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital readmission rates have been analyzed due to their contribution to increasing medical costs. Little is known about readmission rates after urological procedures. We aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission after discharge in patients treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Data from 160 consecutive patients who underwent TURP from January 2015 to December 2016 were analysed. Intra hospitalization characteristics included length of stay (LOS), catheterization time (CT) and complications. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Mean (SD) age was 70.1 (8.1) yrs and mean prostate volume was 80 (20.1) ml. Mean LOS and CT were 4.9 (2.5) days and 3.3 (1.6) days, respectively. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 14.4%, but only 7 (4.4%) patients required hospitalization. The most frequent reasons for readmission were haematuria (6.8%), fever/urinary tract infections (4.3%) and acute urinary retention (3.1%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age, CCI and CT to be independent predictors of readmission. However, when analysed according to age at the time of surgery, a beneficial effect from longer CT was observed only for patients older than 75 years. These parameters should be taken in account at the time of discharge after TURP.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityEuropeHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient ReadmissionPrognosisTransurethral Resection of Prostate

Identifiers

PMID29700356
PMCPMC5919965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.