ArticleBMJ open2018
Evaluation of a decision aid for incidental genomic results, the Genomics ADvISER: protocol for a mixed methods randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03244202 (Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Aid for Incidental Genomic Findings), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Aid for Incidental Genomic Findings
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing across clinical indications: a systematic review.Human genetics · 2021Pooled it
- The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Trial
- A randomized controlled study of a consent intervention for participating in an NIH genome sequencing study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Trial
- Supporting decisions about genomic newborn screening at scale in the digital age: the BabyScreen+ study.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating paediatric subspecialists into the delivery of genomic medicine: A qualitative study.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Great expectations: patients' preferences for clinically significant results from genomic sequencing.Human genetics · 2023Article
- Development and early-stage evaluation of a patient portal to enhance familial communication about hereditary cancer susceptibility testing: A patient-driven approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Digital health-enabled genomics: Opportunities and challenges.American journal of human genetics · 2022Review
- Article
- DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Evaluating the resource implications of different service delivery models for offering additional genomic findings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Public engagement with genomic medicine: a summary of town hall discussions.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Genome-Wide Sequencing for Unexplained Developmental Disabilities or Multiple Congenital Anomalies: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2020Article
- Article
- Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Development of patient "profiles" to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
- The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGenome sequencing, a novel genetic diagnostic technology that analyses the billions of base pairs of DNA, promises to optimise healthcare through personalised diagnosis and treatment. However, implementation of genome sequencing faces challenges including the lack of consensus on disclosure of incidental results, gene changes unrelated to the disease under investigation, but of potential clinical significance to the patient and their provider. Current recommendations encourage clinicians to return medically actionable incidental results and stress the importance of education and informed consent. Given the shortage of genetics professionals and genomics expertise among healthcare providers, decision aids (DAs) can help fill a critical gap in the clinical delivery of genome sequencing. We aim to assess the effectiveness of an interactive DA developed for selection of incidental results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will compare the DA in combination with a brief Q&A session with a genetic counsellor to genetic counselling alone in a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. Patients who received negative standard cancer genetic results for their personal and family history of cancer and are thus eligible for sequencing will be recruited from cancer genetics clinics in Toronto. Our primary outcome is decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes are knowledge, satisfaction, preparation for decision-making, anxiety and length of session with the genetic counsellor. A subset of participants will complete a qualitative interview about preferences for incidental results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by research ethics boards of St. Michael's Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. This research poses no significant risk to participants. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel patient-centred tool to support clinical delivery of incidental results. Results will be shared through national and international conferences, and at a stakeholder workshop to develop a consensus statement to optimise implementation of the DA in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03244202; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.