Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29699985›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of ophthalmology2018

Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling.

Timothy R Fricke, Monica Jong, Kovin S Naidoo, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas J Naduvilath, Suit May Ho, Tien Yin Wong, Serge Resnikoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06278974 (A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Cost of Use of Peripheral Defocus Spectacles, Frame Glasses, and Orthokeratology Lenses in Myopic Children and Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 193 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06278974 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Cost of Use of Peripheral Defocus Spectacles, Frame Glasses, and Orthokeratology Lenses in Myopic Children and Adolescents

TypeobservationalSponsorHe Eye HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsMyopia, Cost-effectiveness Analysis, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 352 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors associated with pathologic myopia onset and progression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Myopia prediction: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Negligible Rebound in Myopia Progression Following Cessation of Treatment with 0.01% Atropine for 3 years: Year-4 Results from the CHAMP Phase 3 Clinical Trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Effects of Atropine Treatment on Choroidal Thickness in Myopic Children.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Trial
  17. Article
  18. Exploring Characteristics and Systemic Health Links in Myopic Australian Adults.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Compliance with orthokeratology lens wear: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy R FrickeBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Monica JongBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Kovin S NaidooBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia k.naidoo@brienholdenvision.org.
Padmaja SankaridurgBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Thomas J NaduvilathBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Suit May HoBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Tien Yin WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Serge ResnikoffBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-4446
Brien Holden Vision Institute · AUNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe used systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and assimilate evidence quantifying blindness and visual impairment (VI) associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD), then derived models to predict global patterns. The models were used to estimate the global prevalence of blindness and VI associated with MMD from 2000 to 2050.

methodsThe systematic review identified 17 papers with prevalence data for MMD VI fitting our inclusion criteria. Data from six papers with age-specific data were scaled to relative age-dependent risk and meta-analysed at VI and blindness levels. We analysed variance in all MMD VI and blindness data as a proportion of high myopia against variables from the place and year of data collection, with a model based on health expenditure providing the best correlation. We used this model to estimate the prevalence and number of people with MMD VI in each country in each decade.

resultsWe included data from 17 studies comprising 137 514 participants. We estimated 10.0 million people had VI from MMD in 2015 (prevalence 0.13%, 95% CI 5.5 to 23.7 million, 0.07% to 0.34%), 3.3 million of whom were blind (0.04%, 1.8 to 7.8 million, 0.03% to 0.10%). We estimate that by 2050, without changing current interventions, VI from MMD will grow to 55.7 million people (0.57%, 29.0 to 119.7 million, 0.33% to 1.11%), 18.5 million of whom will be blind (0.19%, 9.6 to 39.7 million, 0.11% to 0.37%).

conclusionThe burden of MMD blindness and VI will rise significantly without efforts to reduce the development and progression of myopia and improve the management of MMD.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalBlindnessGlobal HealthHumansMacular DegenerationMyopia, DegenerativePersons with Visual DisabilitiesPrevalenceVisual Acuityblindnessmacular degenerationmyopiaprevalencevisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID29699985
PMCPMC6047154
OpenAlexW2799374997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.