Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29699551›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Carlsberg alibi marketing in the UEFA euro 2016 football finals: implications of Probably inappropriate alcohol advertising.

Rachael Murray, Magdalena Opazo Breton, John Britton, Jo Cranwell, Bruce Grant-Braham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachael MurrayUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Rachael.murray@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5477-2557
Magdalena Opazo BretonUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
John BrittonUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jo CranwellUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Bruce Grant-BrahamSchool of Sports and Physical Activity, Faculty of Management, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol advertising is a key driver of alcohol consumption, and is prohibited in France by the Loi Evin. In 2016 the Danish brewer Carlsberg sponsored the UEFA Euro 2016 finals, held in France, and used the alibis 'Probably' and '…the best in the world' in place of Carlsberg in pitch-side advertising. We have quantified the advertising exposure achieved during the final seven games in the UEFA Euro 2016 championship.

methodsAppearances of the Carlsberg alibis 'Probably' and 'the best in the world' were counted and timed to the nearest second during all active play in live coverage of quarter final, semi-final and final matches broadcast in the UK. We used census data and viewing figures from Kantar Media to estimate gross and per capita impressions of these advertisements in the UK population.

resultsIn 796 min, 29 s of active play there were 746 alibi appearances, totalling 68 min 35 s duration and representing 8.6% of active playing time. Appearances were particularly frequent at the end of normal time, extra time and penalties. The seven matches delivered up to 7.43 billion Carlsberg alibi impressions to UK adults and 163.3 million to children. In the only match involving a second country with laws prohibiting alcohol advertising (France versus Iceland), exposure occurred for only 1.8% of playing time.

conclusionsAlibi marketing achieved significant advertising coverage during the final seven EURO 2016 championship games, particularly to children. Since 'Probably' is registered by Carlsberg as a wordmark this advertising appears to contravene the Loi Evin, though Carlsberg have defended their marketing actions.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesSoccerAdolescentAdultAdvertisingAlcohol DrinkingChildChild, PreschoolFranceHumansMarketingTelevisionUnited KingdomAdvertisingAlcoholAlibiChildrenExposureImpressions

Identifiers

PMID29699551
PMCPMC5921309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.