Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29699543›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2018

What predicts emotional response in men awaiting prostate biopsy?

AnnMarie Groarke, Ruth Curtis, Deirdre M J Walsh, Francis J Sullivan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03881709 (The Efficacy of Decision Support E-book for Reducing Decisional Conflict on Prostate Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03881709 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Decision Support E-book for Reducing Decisional Conflict on Prostate Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2019 to 2019Enrolled110ConditionsProstate-Specific AntigenArmsUsing an E-Book
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

AnnMarie GroarkeSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. annmarie.groarke@nuigalway.ie.
Ruth CurtisSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Deirdre M J WalshSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Francis J SullivanProstate Cancer Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

Cancer Care West CHY 11260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of prostate cancer is increasing as opportunistic screening becomes widespread and life expectancy rises. Despite screening availability, research reveals conflicting results on medical outcomes, for example, disease specific mortality. However the gold standard in early diagnosis of potentially curable organ confined prostate cancer is transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy (TRUS-BX). While focus has been given to medical sequalae there is a paucity of research on the psychological impact of biopsy. Awaiting biopsy may be inherently stressful but no studies to date, have assessed men's perception of stress and its impact on emotional response. This study, therefore, examines the role of stress and also personal resources namely, self-efficacy and sense of coherence in emotional adjustment in men awaiting a prostate biopsy.

methodsMen attending a Rapid Access Prostate Cancer Clinic for a transrectal prostate biopsy (N = 114) participated in the study. They completed self report questionnaires on perceived stress (PSS), generalised self-efficacy (GSES), and sense of coherence (SOC). Adjustment was measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS-B) which assesses tension, depression, anger, fatigue, confusion and vigour.

resultsHierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that the set of predictors accounted for 17%-34% of variance across six mood states and predicted 46% of total mood disturbance. Perceived stress explained variance on all domains (11%-26%) with high stress linked to poor functioning.

conclusionPerceived stress was the strongest and most consistent predictor of emotional adjustment. This is an important finding as stress appraisal has not been examined previously in this context and suggests that stress management is an important target to enhance emotional wellbeing of men attending for a prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

EmotionsSelf ReportAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstateProstatic NeoplasmsStress, PsychologicalEmotional adjustmentProstate biopsySelf-efficacySense of coherenceStress

Identifiers

PMID29699543
PMCPMC5922026
OpenAlexW2804367740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.