Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29699480›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Enhanced JBrowse plugins for epigenomics data visualization.

Brigitte T Hofmeister, Robert J Schmitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Chromatin accessibility profiling methods.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. dictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center (version 2.0) - a progress report.The International journal of developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brigitte T HofmeisterInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. bth29393@uga.edu.
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. schmitz@uga.edu.

Funding

T32 Predoctoral training grant in geneticsT32GM007103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI DYER, KELLY A · 1985 to 2021
$5.9M
National Science Foundation IOS-1546867NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007103NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew sequencing techniques require new visualization strategies, as is the case for epigenomics data such as DNA base modifications, small non-coding RNAs, and histone modifications.

resultsWe present a set of plugins for the genome browser JBrowse that are targeted for epigenomics visualizations. Specifically, we have focused on visualizing DNA base modifications, small non-coding RNAs, stranded read coverage, and sequence motif density. Additionally, we present several plugins for improved user experience such as configurable, high-quality screenshots.

conclusionsIn visualizing epigenomics with traditional genomics data, we see these plugins improving scientific communication and leading to discoveries within the field of epigenomics.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticEpigenomicsSoftwareDNAHumansNucleotide MotifsRNADNARNAEpigenomicsGenome browserGenomicsVisualization

Identifiers

PMID29699480
PMCPMC5921565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.